<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poly Deathmatch</title>
	<link>http://eternalapprentice.blogsome.com/2009/02/11/poly-deathmatch/</link>
	<description>Sex, Love, and Polyamory with Ellie On My Arm</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://eternalapprentice.blogsome.com/2009/02/11/poly-deathmatch/#comment-83</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eternalapprentice.blogsome.com/2009/02/11/poly-deathmatch/#comment-83</guid>
					<description>I sat on this for a few days longer than I intended before commenting. Sorry about that, since I know you were looking for responses.

Honestly, I  would have similar feelings about polyfidelity and monogamy. They feel too similar to me. Part of the reason that open relationships work so well for me is that when I meet someone (or when my relationship with someone changes) I don't have to try and put that relationship in a specific box. I'm not limited to only certain ways of interacting with them. It can develop in such a way that works for us specifically. Polyfidelity would return me to being constantly aware of the limitations in what I can be to others and what in what ways we can appropriately interact. That's not a feeling I like at all.

I hope y'all can resolve this in a way that makes everyone happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I sat on this for a few days longer than I intended before commenting. Sorry about that, since I know you were looking for responses.</p>
	<p>Honestly, I  would have similar feelings about polyfidelity and monogamy. They feel too similar to me. Part of the reason that open relationships work so well for me is that when I meet someone (or when my relationship with someone changes) I don&#8217;t have to try and put that relationship in a specific box. I&#8217;m not limited to only certain ways of interacting with them. It can develop in such a way that works for us specifically. Polyfidelity would return me to being constantly aware of the limitations in what I can be to others and what in what ways we can appropriately interact. That&#8217;s not a feeling I like at all.</p>
	<p>I hope y&#8217;all can resolve this in a way that makes everyone happy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marla Singer</title>
		<link>http://eternalapprentice.blogsome.com/2009/02/11/poly-deathmatch/#comment-82</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eternalapprentice.blogsome.com/2009/02/11/poly-deathmatch/#comment-82</guid>
					<description>Hmm...well I never felt like I was a fast-food joint with you.  Nor do I think that's how you saw/see our weird friendship.  &quot;What's in it for the people I'm with?&quot;  - a great friendship, someone to talk to, someone to discuss kink with, over a &quot;safely alternative&quot; lunch, with a touch of sex/fondling.  

Please please keep this work/thought in progress updated, you know that I'd love to see how it turns out :P  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hmm&#8230;well I never felt like I was a fast-food joint with you.  Nor do I think that&#8217;s how you saw/see our weird friendship.  &#8220;What&#8217;s in it for the people I&#8217;m with?&#8221;  - a great friendship, someone to talk to, someone to discuss kink with, over a &#8220;safely alternative&#8221; lunch, with a touch of sex/fondling.  </p>
	<p>Please please keep this work/thought in progress updated, you know that I&#8217;d love to see how it turns out :P
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
